Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-31 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.43 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 480.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 436 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 735 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the Honor 200 Pro, having an 82.9 score against 69.3. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a just a little lighter phone than the Honor 200 Pro, but both have the same thickness. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a lot better performance than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The Honor 200 Pro features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch and a bit worse resolution of 1224 x 2700px, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Honor 200 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 200 Pro also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Honor 200 Pro has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Honor 200 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5200mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs a little more than Honor 200 Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.