Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-05-31 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.43 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 480.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 436 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 735 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is a lot better than Honor 200 Pro's 69.3 score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Honor 200 Pro has Android 14. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction has the same thickness than Honor 200 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a really superior processing power than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores. Honor 200 Pro features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little greater display pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1224 x 2700 pixels resolution.
The Honor 200 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor 200 Pro also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and a much higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Honor 200 Pro counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Honor 200 Pro features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5200mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a little more money than the Honor 200 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.