Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-05-31 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.43 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| $ 480.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 436 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 735 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is a bit better than Honor 200 Pro's 69.3 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version while Honor 200 Pro has Android 14 version, counting with some additional features. The Moto Z Force is an incredibly older cellphone than Honor 200 Pro, but Motorola made it lighter and somewhat thinner.
Honor 200 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little bit worse 1224 x 2700 resolution and a quite lower display pixel density, it also counts with a larger display. Motorola Moto Z Force has a much more powerful CPU than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores.
Honor 200 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 200 Pro also counts with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Moto Z Force has a better memory to store more apps and games than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Honor 200 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z Force is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.