Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-31 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.43 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 480.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 436 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 735 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the Honor 200 Pro's overall score of 69.3. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A6 is notably older than the Honor 200 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner. Honor 200 Pro features a way better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1224 x 2700px and a greater screen density.
The Honor 200 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A6 features a much better processing power than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
Honor 200 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 5200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Honor 200 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low-light situations, it also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, a much higher 50 MP resolution camera and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A6 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.