Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2024-05-31 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.43 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 480.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 436 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 735 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 6.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S4 is just a bit better than the Honor 200 Pro, with a 76.1 score against 69.3. Samsung Galaxy S4 is an noticeably older phone than Honor 200 Pro, but it is just a little thinner and extremely lighter anyway. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S4 has newer 4.4.2 version and Honor 200 Pro has Android 14, so it offers a lot of extra features.
Honor 200 Pro features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way larger display and a better resolution of 1224 x 2700. Samsung Galaxy S4 features a really superior processing power than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has 10 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a graphics co-processor.
The Honor 200 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S4, because it has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
The Honor 200 Pro has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Honor 200 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S4, because it has a 5200mAh battery size.
Galaxy S4 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.