Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than the Honor 50 Pro, having a global score of 88.1 against 77. Apple iPhone X is an extremely older phone than Honor 50 Pro, but Apple managed to make it just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The iPhone X features just a bit better display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower 1125 x 2436px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity per inch of screen.
The Apple iPhone X features a little better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Honor 50 Pro counts with a better camera than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution.
IPhone X has as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the Honor 50 Pro one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Honor 50 Pro has a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.