Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a little bit better than Honor 50 Pro, with a overall score of 80.2 against 77. The Google Pixel is a much older and a little thicker phone than the Honor 50 Pro, but Google managed to build it much lighter anyway. Honor 50 Pro has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Honor 50 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better 1236 x 2676 resolution and a way bigger display. Honor 50 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Honor 50 Pro features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 44% greater battery capacity. The Honor 50 Pro has a very superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.