Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's 77 score. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a a little lighter cellphone than the Honor 50 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Honor 50 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit more vivid display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a little bit better count of pixels in each inch of screen. The Honor 50 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Honor 50 Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has more internal storage. Honor 50 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.