Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. The Google Pixel 3 design has the same thickness than the Honor 50 Pro, but it is extremely lighter. Google Pixel 3 features a display that is very similar to Honor 50 Pro's screen, although the Google Pixel 3 has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a just a bit lower display density.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Honor 50 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Honor 50 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Honor 50 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.