Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than Honor 50 Pro, with an 80.7 score against 77. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a just a little lighter device than the Honor 50 Pro, but both are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better looking screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch of display and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Honor 50 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Honor 50 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Honor 50 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.