Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, with a 78.8 score against 77. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. Google Pixel 3a is a incredibly older and just a little thicker cellphone than Honor 50 Pro, but Google was able to make it way lighter anyway.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 and a bigger display.
Honor 50 Pro has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Honor 50 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Honor 50 Pro has longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.