Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 overall score. Even though Google Pixel 4 is older and a bit thicker than Honor 50 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 4 has a little faster processor than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels amount per inch in the display. Honor 50 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 50 Pro features a greater camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.