Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Honor 50 Pro's overall score of 77. Even being the best in this comparison, Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Honor 50 Pro. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better looking display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a bit greater screen density.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better CPU than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Honor 50 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
Honor 50 Pro has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor 50 Pro features just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.