Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro, having an 82.9 score against 77. The Google Pixel 4a body is noticeably lighter than Honor 50 Pro, although it is just a little bit thicker and was released around 10 months before. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should give all the same OS features.
The Honor 50 Pro and the Google Pixel 4a both count with really similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 4a has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen pixels density. The Honor 50 Pro has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM. Honor 50 Pro features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Honor 50 Pro has a greater camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.