Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G and Honor 50 Pro were released only 7 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G design is a little bit thicker but also lighter. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide you identical operating system features.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels, a quite larger display and a just a little greater pixels number in each inch of display. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Honor 50 Pro has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory. Honor 50 Pro features just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Honor 50 Pro counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.