Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than Honor 50 Pro, with a general score of 89 against 77. The Google Pixel 5 design has the same thickness than Honor 50 Pro, but it's lighter. Google Pixel 5 and Honor 50 Pro feature quite similar CPUs, both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM.
Honor 50 Pro has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels. The Honor 50 Pro features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a little longer battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity. Honor 50 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.