Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 440 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 score. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. Although HTC One M9 is much older and somewhat thicker than the Honor 50 Pro, it's construction is still lighter.
The HTC One M9 features a much better looking display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. Honor 50 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
HTC One M9 counts with a little better processing power than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processing unit. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Honor 50 Pro features a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.