Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 440 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro, with a overall score of 77 against 77. The HTC U Ultra body has the same thickness than Honor 50 Pro, but it's just a little lighter. The Honor 50 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. HTC U Ultra has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Honor 50 Pro features a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Honor 50 Pro features superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.