Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, having a global score of 82.7 against 77. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version. Although it's the best in this comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is an older, a bit thicker and a little bit heavier device than the Honor 50 Pro.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels, a little higher number of pixels per display inch and a little bigger screen.
Honor 50 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in Honor 50 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.