Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 global score. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. Despite of the fact that the LG V40 ThinQ is noticeably older than Honor 50 Pro, it's body is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
The LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Honor 50 Pro has a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG V40 ThinQ features a better storage to install applications and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Honor 50 Pro has greater battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.