Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor 50 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a global score of 77 against 75.8. Even though Honor 50 Pro is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it's heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Honor 50 Pro has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto Z Force features a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Honor 50 Pro features a lot better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.