Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a global score of 77.4, which is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's global score of 77. Despite of the fact that Motorola Moto Z2 Play is way older than Honor 50 Pro, it's design is extremely lighter and extremely thinner. Honor 50 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a bit better screen pixels density, a larger display and a higher 1236 x 2676 resolution.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z2 Play has a better memory to store more games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Honor 50 Pro features a much better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.