Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is a little bit better than the Moto Z3 Play, having a general score of 77 against 76.3. Honor 50 Pro's construction is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the Moto Z3 Play. Honor 50 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Honor 50 Pro has a bit better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit larger display, a better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels and a quite greater pixel amount per display inch. The Honor 50 Pro features a way better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a bigger storage for games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Honor 50 Pro has superior battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.