Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 440 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro, getting a 78.5 score against 77. Motorola One Action is an older and thicker cellphone than Honor 50 Pro, but Motorola managed to make it a little bit lighter anyway. The Honor 50 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because it has a just a little greater number of pixels per display inch, a bit larger screen and a quite better 1236 x 2676 resolution. Motorola One Action counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Honor 50 Pro features a little better battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Honor 50 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.