Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro, getting an 83.8 score against 77. Although Galaxy A50 is notably older than the Honor 50 Pro, it's construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Honor 50 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little higher 1236 x 2676 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a battery life that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Honor 50 Pro. Honor 50 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.