Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than Honor 50 Pro's overall score of 77. Galaxy A51's design has the same thickness than the Honor 50 Pro, but it is a bit lighter. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better 1236 x 2676 resolution and a little higher pixels count per screen inch.
Galaxy A51 has slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Honor 50 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 and Honor 50 Pro both have extremely similar battery performance. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also has a much more MP back-facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.