Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. Despite being the best we compare here, the Galaxy A52 construction is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the Honor 50 Pro. Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a just a little greater pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 and a little bit larger screen.
The Honor 50 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52's camera is very similar to Honor 50 Pro's camera, because although the Galaxy A52 has a camera in the back with much less megapixels and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better memory capacity for games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.