Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Honor 50 Pro, with a 91.3 score against 77. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version. Although it's the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than the Honor 50 Pro.
The Honor 50 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a quite better resolution of 1236 x 2676px, a quite higher display pixel density and a bit bigger screen. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Honor 50 Pro, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a lot less mega pixels resolution back camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a little better battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.