Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's global score of 77. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy A52s is a just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker device than Honor 50 Pro. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The Honor 50 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1236 x 2676, a quite larger display and a quite higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Honor 50 Pro has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A52s counts with a camera that is very similar to the camera in Honor 50 Pro, because although the Galaxy A52s has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit longer battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.