Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 440 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's global score of 77. Although it's the best we are comparing, Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is older, just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Honor 50 Pro. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Honor 50 Pro also has a little greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has more memory for apps and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a processing unit that's just as good as Honor 50 Pro's CPU, both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little longer battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.