Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting an 85.2 score against 77. Galaxy A9 (2018) is a a little lighter phone than the Honor 50 Pro, but they have the same thickness. The Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit higher number of pixels in each screen inch, a slightly better 1236 x 2676px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Honor 50 Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Honor 50 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera. Honor 50 Pro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.