Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 440 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's global score of 77. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy F62 construction is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Honor 50 Pro.
Honor 50 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has 4 more cpu cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better display than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, they both have a same size display.
Honor 50 Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels. The Galaxy F62 has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.