Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than the Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. The Galaxy Fold construction is thinner than Honor 50 Pro, although it's much heavier and was released around a year before.
The Honor 50 Pro features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory for games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processor than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Honor 50 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy Fold features a little better battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.