Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 440 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro, having a 78.9 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy M20 body is just a little bit lighter than the Honor 50 Pro, but it is somewhat thicker and was released many years before. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a little bit larger display, a just a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1236 x 2676px. Honor 50 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Honor 50 Pro features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Honor 50 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a way higher (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy M20 counts with better battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.