Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 440 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's score of 77. Even being the best we are comparing here, we must highlight that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Honor 50 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same size display, the Honor 50 Pro also has a slightly higher 1236 x 2676 resolution and a quite higher pixel count per screen inch.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 features a way better battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.