Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's score of 77. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than Honor 50 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a just a bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have a 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher video resolution and a larger aperture. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.