Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than Honor 50 Pro's global score of 77. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. The Galaxy Note 5 design is just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Honor 50 Pro, although it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a sharper display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Honor 50 Pro features a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Honor 50 Pro has longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Honor 50 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.