Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting a general score of 80.4 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition design has the same thickness than the Honor 50 Pro, but it is lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Honor 50 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Honor 50 Pro features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.