Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is a bit better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 general score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has newer 4.4.2 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11, so it gives you some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 construction is somewhat lighter than the Honor 50 Pro, although it is just a bit thicker and was released many years before.
Honor 50 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bigger display, a higher 1236 x 2676 resolution and a little bit higher pixel density. The Honor 50 Pro features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also has a camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
Honor 50 Pro has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.