Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than Honor 50 Pro, having a score of 86.3 against 77. Galaxy S10e is a lighter phone than the Honor 50 Pro, but they have the same thickness. The Galaxy S10e and Honor 50 Pro feature very similar displays, although the Galaxy S10e has a quite worse screen pixel density, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy S10e features a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e has a little better processing power than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Honor 50 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much more MP camera.
Honor 50 Pro features greater battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.