Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 overall score. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version, giving you a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device than the Honor 50 Pro, we must tell that it's also an older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better CPU than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a quite greater display pixel density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior camera than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 108 megapixels, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher video definition and a larger aperture for better images in poorly lited situations. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more memory to store more apps and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features greater battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.