Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Honor 50 Pro, getting a 95.4 score against 77. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version, providing some nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is somewhat thicker and heavier than Honor 50 Pro.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking display than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bit better amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots better photographs and videos than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have a 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light situations. Honor 50 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.