Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a global score of 77 against 75.8. The Honor 50 Pro is a much newer and extremely thinner phone than Galaxy S7 Active, although it's just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Honor 50 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Honor 50 Pro and the Galaxy S7 Active both have incredibly similar battery performance. Honor 50 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.