Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 global score. Galaxy S7 edge's design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the Honor 50 Pro, although it was released many years before. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11, providing the user some nice extra features and performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a little more vivid screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Honor 50 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Honor 50 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution camera.
The Honor 50 Pro has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.