Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is a little bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, having an 81.7 score against 77. Galaxy S8 is a lighter phone than Honor 50 Pro, but they are 0.31inches thick. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a bit sharper screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Honor 50 Pro has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Honor 50 Pro has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Honor 50 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.