Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 score. Despite being the best device in this review, the Galaxy S8 Active design is noticeably older, heavier and extremely thicker than Honor 50 Pro. The Honor 50 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit more vivid screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a quite better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. Honor 50 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Honor 50 Pro has a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Honor 50 Pro and the Galaxy S8 Active have similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.