Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 77. Even though the Galaxy S9 is much older and just a little thicker than the Honor 50 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better processing power than Honor 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per inch of screen. Honor 50 Pro features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Honor 50 Pro has superior battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 50 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a much smaller aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.