Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 440 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro's score of 77. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Although Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the Honor 50 Pro, it must be noted that it is also an older, heavier and notably thicker phone.
Honor 50 Pro has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1236 x 2676, a quite better pixels number per inch in the display and a little bit larger screen. The Honor 50 Pro features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The Honor 50 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 1 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.