Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Honor 50 Pro, having a global score of 88.5 against 77. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is older than Honor 50 Pro, it's body is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a display that's just as good as the screen in Honor 50 Pro, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little bit lower pixel density, they both have a display of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Honor 50 Pro have similar storage to store more apps and games, they have the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior CPU than Honor 50 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Honor 50 Pro features longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. The Honor 50 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.