Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 440 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is just a bit better than Honor 50 Pro, having a global score of 81.6 against 77. Even being the best in this review, we must highlight that it is also older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an older 10 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better screen than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, they both have a display of the same size. The Honor 50 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Honor 50 Pro features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's camera is very similar to the Honor 50 Pro one, and although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much less MP resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has greater battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 29% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.